Lamb, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Detected resemblance and you will relationships achievement one of matchmaking people: A keen idiographic means
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). In the event the I am not saying very hot, will you be scorching or otherwise not?: Physical-appeal analysis and dating choices because a function of an individual’s very own elegance. Psychological Science, 19, 669677. [ Links ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic relationship. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of aspiration. Within the J. McV. Look (Ed.), Character therefore the choices problems (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Force. [ Links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating dating relationships future that have insiders’ and you will outsiders’ angle: Which and you will what exactly is questioned matters. Personal Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital quality in newlyweds: One or two situated approach. Record regarding Personality and Personal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Statement to your Pew Internet sites & Western Lifestyle Project. Recovered , out of [ Website links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Determining the precision of predictions regarding matchmaking relationship: Exactly how and why create lovers’ forecasts vary from people produced by perceiver? Identification and Societal Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Website links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing things on initiation from heterosexual relationships. Papers showed at Earliest In the world Fulfilling into Private Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, E.R., & Richardson, R.An excellent. (2000). Electronic dating and you will digital relating: Conceptualizing pc mediated intimate relationship. Family, 44, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]
Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was genuine similarity essential attraction? A beneficial meta-analysis out of actual and you will identified similarity. Log from Public and personal Relationship, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]
Morry, Meters. M. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction since the good predictor out-of similarity critiques; An examination of appeal-similarity theory. Log out-of Societal and personal Dating, 22, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]
Record away from Societal and private Relationship, 23, 865-880
Morry, M. M. (2007). The destination-similarity hypothesis one of cross-sex members of the family: Relationship fulfillment, thought of asiatiska datingsajter gratis utan kostnad parallels, and you will notice-helping attitudes. Diary off Social and private Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you can extension of your SVR concept from dyadic pairing. Diary off ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Links ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll divorce case: A fourteen-season longitudinal examination of black colored partners and you can light people. Log out-of Public and personal Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). New like formula Suits believes it offers discovered an algorithm for governing the online matchmaking business: A technical approach to finding Mr. or Ms. Right. Providers 2.0 Mag. Retrieved for the out-of [ Links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identification similarities for the couples. Identification and you can Individual Differences, forty-five, 533-535. [ Website links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Companion choice: What qualities create folks desire within their brief-title sexual and enough time-term personal people? Diary out of Mindset and you may People Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). This new role of the worry about on the initiation and you will course of societal communication. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]